- The objective test asks whether a reasonable person in the plaintiff's position would have believed that she/he was the subject of quid pro quo sexual harassment. For example, if the plaintiff is a woman, the test relies on a reasonable woman standard (see Ellison v Brady (9th Cir 1991) 924 F2d 872, 878). If applicable, the plaintiff's other traits, such as, race, age, physical or mental disability, and sexual orientation, are also considered.
- The subjective test asks whether the alleged harasser actually intended to subject the plaintiff to quid pro quo harassment, considering plaintiff's fundamental characteristics, and individual traits known to the accused that make the plaintiff particularly vulnerable to quid pro quo sexual harassment. Also considered are characteristics of or information about the accused that are known to the plaintiff. A defendant may be liable under the subjective test if he or she intentionally took advantage of some particular fear or weakness of the plaintiff.
"This for That" harassment is generally the most recognized form of sexual harassment. Punitive damages are awarded if the claimant establishes that the employer acted with malice to his or her rights.
irs tax attorney
I would agree to Kenjie, harassment is common and recognized form of sexual harassment. If this thing is proven the defendant should be convicted by law.
Bankruptcy Lawyer Las Vegas
Sexual Harassment is a very serious allegation. Also a very scary thing because for women we feel like we are afraid to tell someone about it. I am glad that men and women are strong enough to speak about harassment if it is happening to them.
kansas city bankruptcy attorney
Post a Comment