This blog is a forum for open and fair dialoge regarding workplace harassment in the State of California. Its aim is to explore people's experiences in the workplace and to discuss employee and employer rights. This blog should be a constructive place to learn and exchange ideas about California Employment Law and a toolbox to Fight Harassment.
Thursday, April 10, 2008
Indirect Sexual Harassment
An employee may have a claim for sexual harassment even when sexually harassing conduct permeates the work environment of the employee, even if such conduct is not directed at the employee if: (1) it occurs in the employee's presence; or, (2) is directed at the employee but does not occur in his/her presence. (See e.g., Beyda v. City of Los Angeles (1998) 65 Cal.App.4th 511, 518; Fisher v. San Pedro Peninsula Hospital (1989) 214 Cal.App.3d 590, 611; Kortan v. State of California (Central Dist. Cal 1998) 5 F.Supp.2d 843, 850.)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
Attorneys need to make sure that the potential for public criticism is understood by the client before an argument is raiseddistrict attorney case management software
Post a Comment